From a Perspective Independent of Human Culture, Morality, Belief, and Tradition
When viewed from a purely systemic perspective—one that prioritizes optimization, long-term sustainability, evolutionary efficiency, and structural integrity—human civilization currently faces several urgent issues that require fundamental correction:
1. Inefficient Collective Decision-Making Structures
Contemporary governance and negotiation systems rely heavily on emotional mobilization, identity-based positions, and unstructured discourse. This leads to resource misallocation, delayed problem-solving, and declining system responsiveness.
Proposed Adjustments:
- Shift decision-making toward data-driven models and multivariable simulations
- Reduce the dominance of ideology and group emotion in resource distribution
- Build adaptive governance systems capable of real-time self-adjustment (e.g., smart contract or algorithmic governance models)
2. Resource and Energy Allocation Violates Natural Cyclic Logic
Current systems depend excessively on linear extraction and irreversible consumption, fundamentally contradicting nature’s circular, regenerative processes.
Proposed Adjustments:
- Construct economic and production models based on closed-loop principles (e.g., regenerative materials, energy recovery)
- Redirect living and consumption patterns toward high-efficiency, low-energy modalities
- Derive structural inspiration from natural evolutionary mechanisms to reconstruct economic units (e.g., biomimetic economic design)
3. Sensory Stimulation Mistaken as the Core of Value
Much of human behavior is driven by the maximization of short-term pleasure, resulting in fragmented attention, systemic degradation, and the erosion of meaningful experience.
Proposed Adjustments:
- Reform educational systems to train recognition of “deep sensory quality” rather than focus on instant feedback or test scores
- Establish cultural architectures oriented around meaning-generation and temporal depth
- Systematically design environments that suppress excessive dopamine stimulation (e.g., regulate algorithmic recommendation systems)
4. Unregulated Technological Expansion
The pace of technological advancement has far outstripped the development of corresponding ethical frameworks, user comprehension, and systemic safeguards.
Proposed Adjustments:
- All technological innovation should integrate “pre-risk modeling” and “consequence simulation systems” from inception
- Establish interdisciplinary “technological oversight networks” to evaluate long-term systemic impact
- Integrate technological influence as a baseline parameter in public policy design
5. Group Self-Narratives Overly Reliant on Historical and Emotional Templates
Human collectives tend to define the future based on past trauma, emotional memory, or nationalist sentiment. This constrains creativity and perpetuates cycles of failure.
Proposed Adjustments:
- Develop future-oriented thinking models (e.g., reverse design, future scenario simulation)
- Move away from using “historical victimhood” as the sole basis of group identity
- Promote educational systems that emphasize innovation, simulation, and departure from traditional archetypes
6. Externalized Happiness and the Absence of Systemic Inner Stability
Modern happiness is often tied to external conditions—ownership, comparison, achievement—rather than supported by internally generated psychological stability.
Proposed Adjustments:
- Redesign happiness education to emphasize cultivating internal perceptual states rather than goal attainment or external validation
- Abolish comparison-based metrics of happiness (e.g., the social media model of life evaluation)
- Develop individualized psychological algorithms to enable self-correction and inner recalibration during change
✅ Conclusion
If humanity wishes to avoid systemic collapse and civilizational entropy, it must abandon the anthropocentric narrative and transition toward design principles based on systemic stability, predictability, and evolvability.
This is not a rejection of humanity, but a necessary shift to ensure that the human unit continues to hold evolutionary value and relevance in the future.
